Syria Daily: 50+ Killed as Russia Renews Bombing of Aleppo

PHOTO: A man cries for relatives killed by an airstrike in the al-Qaterji neighborhood of Aleppo on Tuesday (Abdalrhman Ismail/Reuters)



Video: Orphaned and Trapped In Aleppo — Sidra’s Story
Syria and Beyond Opinion: Killing the Doctors

Jump to Original Entry

UPDATE 1900 GMT: According to an Iranian outlet, Tehran has put an immediate dent in the prospects for renewed talks, saying it will not attend the discussions in Switzerland on Saturday.

UPDATE 1740 GMT: Russia is claimed that it will restart the political process with the US, despite Washington’s declaration that it has suspended the cooperation over the bombing of Aleppo.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told CNN that the meeting should include Turkey, Saudi Arabia and possibly Qatar: “We would like to have a meeting in this narrow format, to have a businesslike discussion, not another General Assembly-like debate.”

The Russian Foreign Ministry later said the meeting will take place in Switzerland on Saturday:

According to the agreement between Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and US Secretary of State John Kerry, the meeting of foreign ministers of Russia, the US and key regional states to consider possible additional steps to create conditions for the settlement of the Syrian crisis will take place in Lausanne on October 15.

The Ministry said that Iran will also be present.

The US State Department framed the development in a different way, with the State Department indicating that it had invited Russia to Lausanne on a multilateral basis with other members of the International Syria Support Group.

Spokesman John Kirby said the Russians will be present, leaving it to other countries to confirm their attendance. He said the focus would be on getting a new ceasefire and provision of humanitarian aid.

Lavrov said he hoped the discussion might “launch a serious dialogue on the basis of the principles contained in the Russian-American deal”, a week-long ceasefire that collapsed on September 19, just before Russian and regime warplanes destroyed a UN aid convoy west of Aleppo.

Despite the attack, the Foreign Minister blamed Washington for the failure, pointing to a US airstrike the previous week which killed more than 60 regime troops in Deir ez-Zor Province in eastern Syria, near a frontline with the Islamic State.

Washington said the incident was an accident, as it might to target ISIS.

“The violation of the ceasefire happened by the American coalition who attacked the Syrian government, which they were not supposed to do, and which they said they would never plan,” Lavrov said.

UPDATE 1735 GMT: The White Helmets civil defense service reports more deaths in Aleppo from Russia-regime airstrikes:

The Aleppo Media Center reported that strikes targeted an open-air market in the al-Firdous district.

Ibrahim Abu Layth, the spokesman for the Aleppo Civil Defense, said, “We’re still continuing to pull bodies — both casualties and the injured — from underneath the rubble.”


Dust-covered boys after an airstrike on Wednesday (Mahmoud Rslan)

There have also been casualties from pro-Assad attacks near Damascus:

UPDATE 1730 GMT: Russian President Vladimir Putin has turned against France, accusing it of deliberately luring Moscow into vetoing a UN resolution on Syria.

On Saturday, Russia blocked a Franco-Spanish resolution for a ceasefire, humanitarian aid, and suspension of military overflights.

Putin, who on Monday called off a scheduled trip to Paris after criticism by French counterpart Francois Hollande, suggested that France had done the bidding of the US: “It’s not our partners who should be offended by our veto, it’s us who should be offended.”

He said claimed that French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault was told in Moscow last week that Russia would not use its veto if France made some amendments.

“We expected joint, constructive work with France and with other permanent members of the Security Council. But what happened?,” Putin asked:

The French foreign minister flew from Moscow to Washington, the next day he came out with [US Secretary of State John] Kerry, accused Russia of all the deadly sins, no one spoke to us or discussed anything with us, and tossed the resolution into the Security Council obviously expecting our veto.

What for? Knowing our position, and not discussing it with us, they didn’t chuck in the resolution so it would pass. But to get the veto. What for? To exacerbate the situation and to whip up anti-Russian hysteria in media under their control, and to deceive their own citizens.

“I don’t know if that corresponds to the interests of European countries or not. But to just service like this the foreign policy interests, or maybe even the domestic political interests, of their allies, in this case the United States?…

Is that really the role of such serious countries which aspire to conduct independent policies and be called major powers. I don’t know.

In the French Parliament, Prime Minister Manuel Valls repeated that Moscow is propping up the Assad regime and carrying out war crimes in its bombing of Aleppo: “Russia has a responsibility and I call on it to assume its responsibilities to end this massacre. We will continue talking to them, but not in vain.”

ORIGINAL ENTRY: After easing its airstrikes for several days, Russia has renewed bombing of opposition neighborhoods in Syria’s largest city Aleppo.

Russian warplanes struck Daret Izza, Firdous, and the Bustan al-Qasr district, near the crossing between opposition and regime areas. Residents, rescue workers, and the Local Coordination Committees said at least 50 people were killed in and near the city.

The Russian attacks came after rebels fought back against the advance of pro-Assad forces in northern Aleppo, reclaiming a water station. However, the Syrian military claimed that it had consolidated its control of a roundabout at a major intersection.

On the southwestern front, a battle continued for rebel-held Sheikh Saeed. The area is near Ramouseh, the town recaptured by pro-Assad forces — after intense Russian airstrikes — to reimpose a siege on opposition parts of Aleppo in late August.

Russia and the regime renewed airstrikes on Aleppo on September 19, beginning with the destruction of a UN aid convoy, hours after the Syrian military declared an end to a ceasefire arranged by the US and Moscow. More than 500 people were killed in attacks from September 22 to October 5.

Facing international condemnation for its “barbarism” and allegations of complicity in “war crimes”, Russia then reduced its attacks. However, on Saturday Moscow vetoed a UN resolution for a ceasefire, humanitarian aid, and suspension of military overflights.

Tuesday’s assault followed a trip by Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss the situation with Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

Turkey has backed the Syrian opposition and rebels, but Moscow and Iran — the other major ally of the Syrian regime — have been trying to distance Ankara from any attempted overthrow of President Assad.

Civil defence members and men inspect a site damaged after an airstrike in the besieged rebel-held al-Qaterji neighbourhood of Aleppo

Civil defense volunteers and men inspect damage from an airstrike on al-Qaterji district (Abdalrhman Ismail/Reuters)

300 Families Living in Large Cow Barn in Daraa Province

Syria Direct reports on about 300 displaced families living in a concrete cow barn in southwest Daraa Province in southern Syria, a few kilometers from the Jordanian border.

Many of the families fled their homes in the Yarmouk Basin amid battles between Islamic State affiliates and rebel factions. More recent arrivals are from opposition towns that are being bombed by regime forces.

The supervisor of the camp says local authorities lack the funds to provide health care, sanitation, and humanitarian aid.

“There are about 150 children under the age of two who need milk,” says Abdullah, a member of the Daraa provincial council. “We fear that diseases such as malaria and typhoid will spread.”

“We’re people, but we’re living with animals,” adds Abu Mohammed, a barn resident whose family fled their home with “nothing except the clothes on our backs.”

Regime Bombs Palestinian Camp For 11 Days

Russia and the Assad regime have bombed a Palestinian refugee camp southwest of Damascus for 11 days, killing five people and destroying the only hospital.

The assault on the Khan al-Shih camp began on October 1, as pro-Assad forces tried to advance on the ground.

Khan al-Shih is about 25 km (16 miles) from Damascus in an opposition enclave surrounded by the Syrian military and its allies.

“Bombings happen every night; five residents have died, including two children, and 34 have been injured,” Abu Muslim al-Derani, a councilman in the camp, said on Tuesday. “These have been the worst days since the beginning of the revolution.”

Aid organizations that operate in the camp say residents actively block militias from operating there.

Al-Derani explained, “There are no military factions inside the camp. All of them are in the agricultural areas that surround the camp.”

Before the war, Khan al-Shih was home to more than 30,000 refugees. There are now about 12,000 Palestinian refugees and 800 displaced Syrian families in the camp.

With no safe route in or out of the camp, residents are running out of fuel, food, and medicine.

Hezbollah Leader: US-Saudi-Israeli Plot Against Political Settlement

Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah has declared a US-Saudi-Israeli plot to prevent a political settlement in Syria.

Speaking at a religious ceremony in south Beirut on Tuesday night, Nasrallah said the Saudi goal is “to defeat Syria in favor of the Israelis” because the Assad regime is the cornerstone of “the Resistance”:

That’s why they refuse any political solution and want to keep the bloodshed. That’s what the US and Israel want and what some regional and Gulf states help to achieve.

Nasrallah said that Riyadh must accept a transition in which President Assad can stand for re-election.

,” he said, adding that “if it [Saudi Arabia] wants good for the Syrian people, it has to accept the political solution, lining up the transitional government and holding the election” without putting conditions on presidency candidates.

The Hezbollah Secretary-General went farther in claiming that the US is trying to “concentrate” the Islamic State in eastern Syria and along the Iraqi border: “The US wants ISIL [the Islamic State] to prevail.”

He said both the Islamic State and the jihadists of Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, formerly Jabhat al-Nusra, are being used to serve Israeli objectives.

Jihadists of Jund al-Aqsa Release 57 Rebels

The jihadists of Jund al-Aqsa have released 57 rebels as part of a deal to end in-fighting.

Jund al-Aqsa began clashes with the leading rebel faction Ahrar al-Sham almost two weeks ago, abducting a prominent fighter. Members from both sides were killed in subsequent fighting.

The confrontation undermined a rebel offensive that had taken a series of towns and villages in northern Hama Province.

Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, formerly Jabhat al-Nusra, stepped in as a mediator last week. On Sunday, it announced an arrangement for the dissolution of Jund al-Aqsa, with members joining JFS/Nusra and a commitment to eradicate any Islamic State sleeper cells.

A judicial committee will consider claims from each side of abuses.

Rebel Camp for Former ISIS Fighters and Families in Northern Syria

Rebels have established a camp for former Islamic State militants and their families in northern Syria.

The rebel faction Jaish al-Tahrir is running the camp for about 300 defectors and captured combatants, including many non-Syrians.

The commander, Mohammad al-Ghabi, said:

We tried to rehabilitate them and alter their state of minds. Those who wished to return home were allowed to call their embassies and co-ordinate with them through us.

Among the group are French, Dutch, and Polish nationals and fighters from North Africa and across the Middle East and Central Asia.

Ghabi said the numbers are growing as the Islamic State is pushed back in northern Syria by rebels, including a force supported by Turkish intervention from late August.


State Media: 6 Killed by Rockets on School in Daraa

State media say six people, including five children, were killed by a rocket attack on a school in Daraa city in southern Syria.

State news agency SANA, citing a police source, said 20 others were injured.

Regime officials blamed “terrorists”. Rebels denied firing on the school.

Related Posts

Scott Lucas is Professor of International Politics at the University of Birmingham and editor-in-chief of EA WorldView. He is a specialist in US and British foreign policy and international relations, especially the Middle East and Iran. Formerly he worked as a journalist in the US, writing for newspapers including the Guardian and The Independent and was an essayist for The New Statesman before he founded EA WorldView in November 2008.


  1. Al Masdar news “reporting” that negotiations are underway the surrender of East Aleppo. The article goes on to say that the major rebel groups are not, in fact, negotiating anything. Bizarre.

    • Source is Al masdar…..their reporting is without an iota of doubt, 100 % reliable… one and only al masdar and Sana news for complete news about syria…only truth nothing else …(sarcasm)

      • As I already noted above, this article actually says that the big groups are not involved in negotiations. Who are the regime negotiating with? One man and his dog, maybe, because the article freely admits it’s not Zinki, it’s not JFS and it’s not any other big players either.

      • So let me get this straight – Russia bombs an aid convoy, the US says it is cutting off contact, but Kerry still has his goodnight chat with Lavrov everyday and they’ve just gone and invited Russia to a summit.
        I mean, of course observers stopped taking the US at its word some time ago, but obviously not even the administration takes their own words seriously anymore.

        • So let me get this straight – Russia bombs an aid convoy,

          If you want to get it straight, you might want to come up with evidence. Even the US does not accuse the Russians of bombing the convoy, only that it holds Russia responsible, which is an admission they simply want to pin the blame in spite of no evidence.

          • The US also says — along with many governments, NGOs, witnesses, civil defense workers (from both regime and opposition areas) — that Russia bombed the convoy.

            Which is the truth.

            • The US, those many governments, NGOs, witnesses (ie. AlQaeda Whit Helmets) , civil defense workers have not presented one shred of evince that Russia bombed the convoy.

              Which is the truth. And which is why the US has said Russia is to blame even if they did not carry it out.

              Oh and BTW. The US government rejected any investigation into the matter, which is also the truth.

              • Andre, you’re making stuff up again. The US and the UN called for a full, independent investigation.
                The UN confirmed that it was an airstrike that destroyed the convoy. The Russian and Syrian airforces were the only ones in the air over Aleppo. The Russians are the only ones with night vision.
                It is obvious to anyone with a shred of intelligence and integrity that the Russians bombed the aid convoy.

              • No, the US Government has not rejected an investigation. What was dismissed was Russia’s attempt to define the investigation — funny how people recall Moscow’s manipulations around MH17.

                And I think you missed the videos, witness statements, photographs of Russian bomb fragments. Oh and the obvious — who else flies warplanes at night over Aleppo Province?

              • “It is obvious to anyone with a shred of intelligence and integrity that the Russians bombed the aid convoy”

                Forget about it, you are dealing with a die-hard pro-russian. He is mentally shielded against any independent reasoning. If required by the Kremlin´s propaganda he will even deny that aid convoy ever existed.

              • Andre, you’re making stuff up again. The US and the UN called for a full, independent investigation.

                Making nothing up. Kerry condemned Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Levrov’s call for an investigation into an attack against a UN aid convoy, insisting that everyone knows it was Russia’s fault already and that Russia is trying to invent facts. The White House insisted yesterday that Russia was to blame even if it was eventually discovered that Russia didn’t do it.

                The Russian and Syrian airforces were the only ones in the air over Aleppo. The Russians are the only ones with night vision.

                False. The US had predator drones in the sky that evening in the same area.

                It is obvious to anyone with a shred of intelligence and integrity that the Russians bombed the aid convoy.

                Not at all. In fact, as Kerry said, the US position is that the Russians might not have done it but are to blame anyway.

              • this reply shows no understanding of both the incident and the propaganda battle that ensued to try and deflect responsibility.

                No Scott, it shows that your argument is weak. Washington apologists like yourself never seem to be able to answer the simply contradiction that the US is always quick to blame Russia for such events but never produces one iota of evidence, leaving people like yourself to simply base your analysis on social media and so called eye witness accounts.

                That makes your argument propaganda.

                For example, the claim that there are no US aircraft operating over Aleppo is simply a position you have to accept based on American declarations given that you have no access to radar. Two days ago you claimed there was minimal Al Nusra presence in Eastern Aleppo, even as the Pentagon admits Al Nusra are the main force controlling it.

                As for deselecting responsibility, your argument is also compromised. The US has stated that it blames Russia whether Russian planes bombed the convoy or not. The timing of the attack also allowed the US to deflect attention from it;’s own attack on SAA forces which killed 80 Syrian troops fighting ISIS in Deir ez-Zor. The Russians were calling for an emergency meeting of the Security Council (putting the US on the defensive), and presto, the convoy attack came out of the blue and turned the tables back in Washington’s favor at the UN.#

                Al Nusra were opposed to the aid convoy reaching Aleppo. Even the UN were accusing them of blocking the aid for political gain.
                “The UN has accused armed groups in Syria of blocking the delivery of aid to the besieged city of Aleppo for “political gain” – including rebel factions inside Aleppo itself who say they will reject aid that comes through regime territory.”

                Then there is the “eye witness” accounts by the White Helmets of Syrian and Russian helicopters in the sky even though the US stated there was no radar or signal evidence to show there were any helicopters in the air.

                The photo claiming to be part of a Russian shell, right next to the supposed tail piece are dozens of cardboard boxes and containers adjacent that are pristine and show no sign of damage, so the article was likely planted as part of a staged photograph. Even Elliot Higgins was unable to offer as explanation.

              • Ah, so it’s the US coalition who destroyed the UN convoys, with witnesses on the ground involved in the conspiracy — and someone planting the remains of Russian munitions to blame Moscow.

                Don’t know why I didn’t see that earlier. Thank you.

            • . What was dismissed was Russia’s attempt to define the investigation

              No Scott, what was dismissed is that pending an investigation, Russia and Syria would have to be presumed innocent and that this would blunt Washington’s attempt to pile in the pressure on Moscow.

              funny how people recall Moscow’s manipulations around MH17.

              Funny how the MH17 investigations was entirelt manipulated with participants on the board all reserving the right to veto any evidence or conclusions without reason or explanation.

              And I think you missed the videos, witness statements, photographs of Russian bomb fragments.

              You are all too happy to dismiss witness statements Scott, a number of which are contradictory. Some claim the attack was launched by ground based missiles. There are no videos showing planes. There are some pictures of bomb fragments yes, though the origin of those pictures is unverified.

              Oh and the obvious — who else flies warplanes at night over Aleppo Province?

              Anyone with planes in Syria, including US predator drones. Accepting the claim by the US that they have no planes in the area merely on their insistence is the epitome of naivete

              • Sorry — this reply shows no understanding of both the incident and the propaganda battle that ensued to try and deflect responsibility.


                In a nut shell we have another conspiracy, this time several US´s predator drones have destroyed the convoys to deflect attention from its attack on syrian troops fighting ISIS in Deir Ezzor. At least is more sophisticated than the “arson conspiracy” and the “mortar attack conspiracy”. Sadly Andre your “drone conspiracy” is already obsolete. Putin himself has dismissed it, Oceania is no more at war with Eurasia.

                Putin: We know who destroyed aid convoy in Aleppo, Syria

                “It was one of the terrorist groups. And we know that, say, the Americans know it too, but prefer to take a different position, to falsely accuse Russia. This is not helping,” Putin said at an economic forum in Moscow.”


                Russian versions in chronological order:

                1 – Arson

                2 – Mortar attack

                3 – US´s predator drone

                4 – Unidentified terrorist attack

  2. Lol;
    Americans should vote for Donald Trump as president next month or risk being dragged into a nuclear war, according to a Russian ultra-nationalist ally of President Vladimir Putin who likes to compare himself to the U.S. Republican candidate.
    “Americans voting for a president on Nov. 8 must realize that they are voting for peace on Planet Earth if they vote for Trump. But if they vote for Hillary it’s war. It will be a short movie. There will be Hiroshimas and Nagasakis everywhere.”
    Vote for Trump or we will kill you!

    • Jirinovsky, (Reuters)
      When are presidential elections clowns (nationalist,fascists,racists,dictators) support each other.
      And Trump has features from all of the above.

      • and another Putin “surrogate” in US elections (visits to Russia with Russia Today friends corrupt)
        Jill Stein: Trump Is Less Dangerous Than Clinton; She Will Start Nuclear War With Russia
        Normally a Green candidate should comment against Trump (he wants to revive coil and metal industries, being against the pollution agreement of Paris). IMO,any country may use imports if they are cheaper than at home (and keep some manufacture high technology facilities working just in case)

  3. Turkey’s Erdogan criticizes Clinton over remarks of arming Syrian Kurdish groups 10/13/2016

    yılmaz fırat @firat_pozza 10/11/2016
    Rubin says ”frankly, there is now more freedom under the PKK than under Erdoğan”. Clinton is right on Syrian Kurds

    Debbie Bookchin @debbiebookchin 10/6/2016
    Shameful silence in the face of AKP atrocities:”It looks like Syria here. What about human rights? Do they not apply to us?”@KurdishQuestion

Leave a Comment