Thousands more people were forcibly displaced from Syria’s East Ghouta on Tuesday, amid the destruction and killing from pro-Assad attacks and uncertainty over detentions.
About 7,000 people, most of them rebels and their families, left on 100 buses in the early morning. Another displacement is planned this week.
The transfer was the third since the opposition gave up almost all of the territory, held since 2012, last week. About 7,500 were moved from the town of Harasta and thousands were taken from Arbin.
The rebel faction Jaish al-Islam is holding out in Douma, the center of the opposition enclave, but is talks with Russia about a capitulation. The UN said about 70,000 to 80,000 people remain in the town.
Photos circulating on Tuesday show the extent of the devastation that eventually forced the surrender, after more than 1,600 people were killed and thousands wounded in the past seven weeks by the pro-Assad offensive, enabled by Russian airstrikes.
Harasta:
Meanwhile, reports continued of detentions by pro-Assad militia, after claims on Monday that 23 men were executed and five women seized in Kafr Batna and 150, including women and children, in Saqba. Photos yesterday showed men under guard in Saqba:
The UN said those now in regime-controlled “collective shelters” — estimated at about 80,000 people — face difficult conditions and “are not permitted to leave, until they have undergone a screening process and are able to prove a sponsor”.
The Red Cross warned of the risk from communicable diseases and said procedures for people to leave the shelters “should be accelerated”:
Many children who are already extremely weak are being exposed to further health hazards like diarrhea, lice and skin diseases. We have seen many children who had to walk many kilometers barefoot or in completely worn-out shoes.
There were contrasting images in northern Hama Province in northwest Syria, as volunteers received the displaced. One photo showed a White Helmets volunteer carrying baby Bayan, whose mother was killed amid airstrikes four days before the removal:
Claims are circulating this morning of overnight strikes by Russian warplanes on camps for the displaced:
الطيران الاحتلال الروسي يقصف بقنابل الفوسفور الحارقة مخيم عشوائي للنازحين قرب بلدة النقير بريف إدلب الجنوبي
Russian warplanes targeted camp for displaced civilians with phosphorus bombs in Al-Nakker village, southern Idlib countryside. pic.twitter.com/49e7NRwAmH
— Mohamed Aldaher (@mohamed1aldaher) March 27, 2018
Regime: We Will Take Idlib…and Raqqa…and Golan Heights
Challenging not only the Syrian opposition but also the US, Turkey, and Israel, the Assad regime’s UN Ambassador Bashar al-Ja’afari has said it will reclaim areas from opposition-held Idlib Province to Afrin — captured by a Turkish-rebel force from Kurdish militia last week — to Raqqa to the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.
Al-Jaafari confirmed the regime’s intention to break “de-escalation zones”, declared by its ally Russia, with further operations for Idlib in the northwest and the area near the Golan Heights in the southwest.
Russia has already joined the regime in setting aside a de-escalation zone to reoccupy the East Ghouta area near Damascus in a seven-week offensive.
But Ja’afari went farther with his proclamation that the regime will try to evict Turkey and rebel forces from the territory which they have taken in the Kurdish canton of Afrin in the northwest. And he challenged the US-backed, Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces with his statement over Raqqa, taken by the SDF from the Islamic State last autumn.
Amir may or may not be naive, but no one has answered his point: Israel will have either shia or sunnis on it’s borders, there are no other options. So which do you prefer?
Syria could become a semi-democratic and federated republic, like Iraq. Do you see Iraq wanting to attack Israel? Saddam Hussein actually did attack Israel. The Kurds are the closest friends of Israel in the M.E. All this potential was thrown away by that ghastly Obama with his refusal to stop Assad’s bombing and gassing of innocent people.
Iraq is a failed state. No one wants to attack Israel, but Israel most definitely want the US to attack Iran.
Saddam only attacked Israel when he was being bombed out of desperation and need you be reminded Israel had attacked him by then also. Trump says he wants to pull US troops our of Syria. Good to hear. The US need to get lost and stay the hell out.
US needs to stay out so that more Syrians can be gassed by Assad under the supervision of Putin? Did you know that the Russians are the most barbarian race on the planet today? Why did Stalin kill so many millions?
What do you think of Russian Novichok sprayed on Skripal’s doorhandle? Isn’t that barbarianism?
Any idea what Hunter Douglas is?
If the SAA (but not Iran or its Shi’i proxies) takes the Syrian Golan from the Islamists there, it might make Israel very happy.
At this point the SAA is an Iranian proxy. You think Iran shed blood in Syria to be sidelined by their puppet? Your support and naivety of the axis continues to amaze. They are determined to threaten Israel, as they’ve stated numerous times, and you’ve supported them throughout the war. Never seen someone so eager to cut their own throat.
I never “supported” nor I will ever support. There are two branches of Islamism – Shiite and Sunni. Both evil and dangerous. On my border, I prefer to have the less dangerous of the both, meaning the Shiite one. And if it will be the SAA, which is mostly secular, then I can be really happy.
So you are willing to make peace with Nazi Assad, SAA, and the Mukhaberati death squads, while they institute fascist rule in Syria, killing dissenters, torturing innocent people, imprisoning a million political prisoners, developing WMDs, and spreading antisemitism. You Haaretz-fed leftwing regressives don’t have a moral leg to stand on. Why don’t you leave for Gaza?
So you are willing to make peace with Nazi Assad
Israeli leaders have spoken for decades about making peace with Assad. IN fact, at one point they were on the verge of a peace agreement until the neocon infested Bush administration nixed the deal.
You Weekly Standard-fed wingnuts regressive don’t have a moral or factual leg to stand on. Why don’t you worry about your collapsing infrastructure and the 96 Americans a day who day from gun violence?.
Assad and his Russian bosses had not killed 500,000 innocent Syrians at that time, and he pretended to be modern and trying to liberalize Syria. So when he started killing 500,000 innocent Syrians, the Russians fell in love with him. Shame on your country.
Any idea what Hunter Douglas is?
The shiite one is less dangerous? Really? That’s incredible considering the humiliation the shiite axis gave Israel in 2006 and the fact that they have even larger numbers of more advanced rockets aimed at Israel than they did then. And yeah you’ve been openly rooting for the shiite axis for the entirety of the war. I would call that support. The whole point of the shiite axis existing is to threaten and eliminate Israel as the arrogant mullahs have admitted countless times. It makes no sense at all.
The 2006 war was fought entirely on Lebanese territory. There would have been no war had Israel not chosen to invade. For every rocket Hezbollah have, Israel have 10.
Iran was Shiite when Israel and Iran had good relation prior to the revolution, so the hostility is not based on Shiite faith. Furthermore, Iran has the second largest Jewish community in the ME.
Except more than half or Jewish Iranians left Iran after the Islamic revolution, out of fear. Hard for you to understand antisemitism?
which ones chant “death to israel” at every occasion? Dont see the other side exhibiting that behavior. But my view may be slanted since I’m not there. But it does really seem the hezzballs and such are the more dangerous brand
which ones chant “death to israel” at every occasion?
Which one has been calling for war with against Iran for decades? Don’t see Iran talking about attacking Israel do you? And seriously are you going to suggest that public rallies are evidence of foreign policy?
Israel is not calling for war on Iran. It is calling for regime change in Iran because there are no democratic elections in Iran. So difficult for you to understand this, is it not?
At this point the SAA is an Iranian proxy.
At every point, the rebels/moderate rebels/ISIS/Al Qaeda have been US and Saudi proxies. Iran don’t need to be concerned about being sidelined. They have an alliance. There is no threat to Israel other than the fact Israel will eventually have to return the Golan, which was never theirs to begin with.
Iran have never threatened Israel.
Khomeini: “Israel should be wiped off the map.”
Hunter Douglas. No answer? lol
You’re utterly delusional and you spread demonstrably false lies. Honestly I hate even responding to your ludicrous claims because I question your basic comprehension skills. It’s kind of like arguing with a child.
This guy is Russian in Saint Petersburg. Just like Barbar. And Razmjoo is not Iranian.
Kevin is absolutely correct. Your naivete resulted in your support of Nazi Assad. The choice is not between Assad’s Nazism and Iran’s Islamism or Nusrat’s Salafism. The choice is between a democratic pluralistic Syria and an enemy-of-Israel Syria. But you Haaretz-fed one-state regressives pretend to be pro-Israel, while deep inside you wish the destruction of Israel.
“a democratic pluralistic Syria” .. Hmmmm
Maybe in 175 years from today. Not in our lifetime anyway.
Meanwhile, we have to choose between the bad and the very very bad
You are the most naive person ever. Or its just an excuse to hide your love for shias who are ready to burn your country to ashes.
Shias have no desire to burn any country to ashes. They have never attacked Israel nor shown any desire for a confrontation with them.
Caligola – do you recall back in 2014, early 2015 when it was possible to partition Syria into a federation of four republics (Shia, Sunni, Druze, Kurds) — but everyone here said no, it is such a bad thing to destroy a country’s territorial integrity? Now I bet all the naysayers would jump on the opportunity to partition Syria – except that this option is now lost.
do you recall back in 2014, early 2015 when it was possible to partition Syria into a federation of four republics (Shia, Sunni, Druze, Kurds) — but everyone here said no
To this day you still fail to comprehend the fact that it’s not up to you. The ones saying no included the majority of Syrians. The arrogance of Americans imperialists is mind boggling.
it is such a bad thing to destroy a country’s territorial integrity?
Wow, good to see you getting in touch with your inner Lord Farquad.
Now I bet all the naysayers would jump on the opportunity to partition Syria
Like who?
I must have hit a nerve there. Explaining what is good for Syrians makes that “imperialism”? With such a low bar in your postcolonial theory, anything can be imperialism. If US for example decides to help Syrians rebuild their electrical infrastructure, then that is imperialism.
What do you think of Hunter Douglas? Have you heard of this brand?
Like K9 and a few others.