Iran Daily: Tehran Condemns “Senseless Aerial Intervention”….in Yemen, Not Syria

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif (R) with the president of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Peter Maurer, Tehran, March 11, 2018 (Tasnim)

Foreign Minister Zarif denounces Saudi attacks on Yemen, ignores Assad-Russia attacks in Syria


Iran’s Foreign Secretary Mohammad Javad Zarif has condemned bombing of Yemen’s civilians, while avoiding any statement over Tehran’s support of attacks in Syria by the Assad regime and Russia.

Zarif issued the statements in a meeting with Red Cross President Peter Mauer in Tehran on Sunday. He asserted, “The Islamic Republic of Iran will make its utmost efforts to alleviate the pain and suffering of the war-stricken people of Syria and Yemen and dispatch humanitarian aid to the two countries’ people.”

He denounced the Saudi-led military intervention in Yemen from 2015, backing the Government against an insurgency by Ansar Allah (Houthis) which took the capital Sana’a and much of the country. Thousands of civilians have been slain, and millions are at risk from shortages of food and supplies amid a blockade by Saudi Arabia and its allies.

Zarif said, “It is imperative for the international community to get more effectively involved in ending the senseless aerial attacks and establishing a ceasefire.” He declared that Iran is ready to cooperate with the UN “to facilitate and encourage an immediate end to these senseless bombardments and initiation of a genuine dialogue to find a political solution to this tragic crisis”.

The Foreign Minister did not make a similar commitment to a ceasefire in Syria, where Iran’s allies have killed about 1,400 people and wounded thousands since February 1 in an assault on East Ghouta near Damascus. Nor did he explain how his call for “humanitarian aid” can be reconciled with the five-year siege on the opposition-held area.

State English-language outlet Press TV tries to cover Zarif’s differing approaches by referring to a January 30 statement by senior advisor Hossein Jabari Ansari, “Iranian forces entered Syria at the request of the Syrian government in order to help Syrian government in the battle against terrorism.”

On Saturday, the Supreme Leader sought deflection from the Assad regime’s chemical attacks on East Ghouta, with at least seven chlorine assaults since January 13, with blame on Western countries for support of Saddam Hussein as Iraq used chemical weapons on Iranian forces in their 1980s war.

“Fruitful Exchange”

Maurer hailed a positive meeting with Zarif in a tweet:

The official also wrote about “an impressive display of [Iranian] search and rescue capabilities” and an agreement “on our joint humanitarian actions”. He praised a meeting with a conservative Iranian ayatollah about “the important contribution of Islamic scholars to build understanding and respect for humanitarian values”.

Maurer did not refer to either Yemen or Syria.

Iran Media Pushes Assad-Russia Propaganda and Disinformation Over Syria

Backing the Supreme Leader’s statement as well as the Assad regime and Russia, Iranian media is stepping up false claims.

Mehr recycles the Assad-Russia smear campaign against White Helmets rescuers. Press TV circulates Iranian and Russian disinformation that pro-Assad forces found “a workshop used by foreign-backed militants to make chemical weapons” in East Ghouta.

Mehr’s attack on the White Helmets was initiated by pro-Assad British agitator Vanessa Beeley, presented as a “journalist” in her polemic in Russia’s Sputnik, and then promoted by the Assad regime’s outlet SANA. Sputnik also posted the chemical workshop disinformation, citing Fars, the outlet of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards.

BBC Complains to UN Over Iran’s Harassment of BBC Persian Staff and Families

The BBC is appealing to the UN Human Rights Council to stop Iran’s harassment of BBC Persian staff in London and their families in Iran.

Iranian authorities have been pursuing a campaign of intimidation and threats against staff, including arrests of relatives, travel bans, seizure of property, and disinformation over sexual behavior.

The regime has targeted BBC Persian since the disputed 2009 Presidential election, when it blamed mass protests on interference by the service and other foreign outlets.

Former BBC employee Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe was seized in April 2016 and is serving a five-year prison sentence for espionage, with no evidence produced to support the claim. BBC Persian staff are unable to travel to Iran — for example, to attend to sick relatives or visit them in hospital or to go to funerals — for fear of arrest.

Some staff have been told to stop working for BBC Persian, or to spy on colleagues, in return for the release of detained relatives. Elderly family members have been interrogated. More than 20 journalists or family members have received death threats.

An estimated 18 million Iranians, a quarter of the population, regularly use the BBC’s Persian service online, on radio, or on satellite television.

Hijab Protester: 2-Year Sentence Won’t Stop Me

Narges Hosseini, handed a two-year sentence last week for her protest over compulsory hijab, has said the punishment will not stop her.

Hosseini was the second woman to take off her hijab and wave it on the end of a stick in Enghelab (Revolution) Street in Tehran. The protests, which began in late December, soon spread across Iran.

Tehran Prosecutor Abbas Jafari Dolatabadi said last Wednesday that Hosseini attempted to “encourage corruption through the removal of the hijab in public”.

Hosseini spent 20 days in prison after her early January protests before was released on bail of 600 million rials (about $16,000). She is expected to serve three months of her sentence, with the other 21 suspended.

Hosseini said she was “shocked by the verdict” — “I did not expect to be condemned to prison and paying a huge fine” — but “even though I have been convicted, I believe more than ever that the compulsory hijab law in Iran should be resisted”.

Iranian authorities said they detained 29 women over the protests, with the Supreme Leader accusing foreign “enemies” of fomenting the women’s demonstrations and implicitly criticizing President Hassan Rouhani for advocating a more lenient line over hijab.

Related Posts

Scott Lucas is Professor of International Politics at the University of Birmingham and editor-in-chief of EA WorldView. He is a specialist in US and British foreign policy and international relations, especially the Middle East and Iran. Formerly he worked as a journalist in the US, writing for newspapers including the Guardian and The Independent and was an essayist for The New Statesman before he founded EA WorldView in November 2008.


  1. Iran’s Foreign Secretary Mohammad Javad Zarif has condemned bombing of Yemen’s civilians, while avoiding any statement over Tehran’s support of attacks in Syria by the Assad regime and Russia

    The Syrian and Yemen conflicts are completely different. Syria is combating terrorists from groups like the Al Qaeda-affiliated Nusrah front who hide among the civilian population. In Yemen, the Saudis are bombing the country to prop up an unpopular dictatorship that refuses to include the Houthis in the government.

    However, the Iranian government view is that, in both conflicts, a ceasefire must be held and a political process initiated. However, in Syria, the opposition just want a ceasefire to give respite to their allied fighters and continue to insist that Assad go which precludes any serious political talks. That’s why it has become necessary to purge Syrian towns of the remaining rebels who refuse to surrender or leave.

      • The bombing of rebel-held areas in Syria is not “senseless. It is designed to flush the rebels out and liberate these areas from their control. Civilian casualties are unavoidable in urban warfare, as was seen in the liberation of Ramadi and Mosul from ISIS rule. There is no alternative if the rebels refuse to surrender.

        • Thx. This crass response — civilian deaths are very avoidable here, for a number of reasons — confirms the ethical and moral depth of your position.

          • Sorry, but urban warfare is very messy and “collateral damage” is unavoidable. The rebels have had every chance to surrender or leave, as the local population whom they have effectively held hostage desperately want, but have refused to do so. Let me ask you something: Was the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki morally acceptable? Most American soldiers and politicians think it was since it ended the war with Japan.

  2. Jahangiri: Iran ready for worst scenarios:

    “Iran is ready for the rainy days and difficult days to handle the situation lest they act against us. So the best solution on hand is the policies of the Resistance Economy.”

    Despite the fact that the editor of this global newssite believes President Trump will stay in the Iran deal, Trump himself recently told Netanyahu that he will not issue waivers for sanctions on May 12 unless the Europeans agree to significant changes to fix the agreement:

    “The president told Netanyahu during their White House meeting last week that the three nations have only proposed “cosmetic changes” that don’t go far enough. Trump is demanding “significant changes” to the Iran deal, not just additional agreements between the U.S. and the European nations, and said he would pull out of the deal if those changes aren’t made, Israeli officials told Axios.”

Leave a Comment