Czech Republic faces “hurricane season” with new parties using anti-establishment appeals
In a year of turbulence across European politics, Dr Tim Haughton of the University of Birmingham — with colleagues Vlastimil Havlik and Kevin Deegan-Krause — looks at last week’s vote in the Czech Republic in an analysis for The Washington Post:
Czech party politics used to be fairly simple. But since 2010, its elections have repeatedly delivered instability and fragmentation. And this past Sunday’s voting shows 2017 is no exception.
As expected, Andrej Babiš’s party ANO won the Czech elections with nearly 30% of the vote. His victory has dominated the headlines in the United States and Europe, but the election also was striking for the collapse of the Social Democrats (ČSSD), the rise of new political forces and a fragmented Parliament with nine parties.
Why did the Social Democrats do so badly?
ČSSD’s share of the vote slumped to 7.3%, its worst performance since the early 1990s. For the past four years, ČSSD had led a government that delivered considerable economic gains. GDP is growing at the highest rate since the economic crisis; Czech unemployment is the lowest in the European Union; and the state budget is in surplus for the first time in more than two decades.
But while ČSSD led the government, Babiš, who served as Finance Minister until May, managed to take the credit.
ANO claimed a significant slice of ČSSD support in part by acquiring ownership of traditional social democratic issues such as increases in the minimum wage, state pensions and salaries for public sector workers.
But ČSSD also made mistakes. Prime Minister Bohuslav Sobotka could have acted earlier when the Stork Nest scandal involving a $2 million European Union subsidy to business interests close to Babiš first broke in 2016. Although Babiš eventually was fired as Finance Minister, the delay highlighted Sobotka’s indecisiveness.
Aware of Sobotka’s unpopularity, the party made Foreign Minister Lubomír Zaorálek its election leader. But that decision was taken too late, and the party’s lackluster campaign failed to win back voters. ČSSD also failed to agree on a common line on immigration, which not only exposed the divisions in the party, but helped make the issue more prominent.
Okamura and Anti-Immigration Appeal
Immigration has become a central theme of European politics even in countries like the Czech Republic, which has low levels of immigrants. The Freedom and Direct Democracy party (SPD) won 10.64 percent of Sunday’s vote by fusing anti-immigration, anti-Islam and anti-EU appeals. Formed by Tomio Okamura, who has a Japanese-Korean father, the party owes much of its success to Okamura’s skillful communications and claims to be a successful businessman.
However, Okamura is not new to the Czech Parliament. His previous party Úsvit (“Dawn”) won election to the Parliament in 2013 soon after the party was formed but suffered internal disagreements and a major breakaway in 2015 when Okamura left.
Pirates in the Parliament
Anti-political and anti-establishment appeals factored into other victories as well, including the Pirate Party’s 10.8%. A slice of that vote comes from what political scientist Seán Hanley dubbed the “liberal center” that has migrated from party to party over the past two decades.
But the Pirates also mobilized around hostility to Okamura’s anti-immigration appeal and won votes from the mainstream parties by criticizing their corrupt and self-serving behavior.
The desire for good governance and a criticism of traditional parties also fueled support for the “Mayors and Independents” movement, which won 5.2 percent of the vote and six of the 200 parliamentary seats.
ODS bounced back, but the Communists slumped
Along with ČSSD, the Civic Democratic Party (ODS) used to be one of the two main parties of Czech politics. It won 11.3%, a moderate improvement from 7.7% in 2013, by playing to its center-right base. The party’s criticism of Babiš’s policy of electronic registration of purchases went down well with small business owners and restaurateurs.
ODS leader Petr Fiala may not be the most charismatic politician, but he has no ties to the corruption scandals that cost the party support in the past. One name associated with previous scandals, Václav Klaus, also factored in ODS’s revival. Václav Klaus junior, the son of the former Prime Minister and President, won the second highest number of preference votes in the country — Czech voters vote for a party but express a preference for up to four candidates on the party’s list. Klaus’s success was likely fueled by his regular blog posts on one of the most read online news websites.
The Communists (KSČM), though, slumped to 7.8%, the party’s lowest result since the fall of communism in 1989. KSČM lost support in part because ANO and SPD, in particular, effectively mobilized elderly and unemployed voters with anti-establishment themes and promises to protect pensions.
It’s A Volatile System
Political scientists look at volatility in elections, using a tool called the Pedersen index that measures the degree of change in vote patterns on a scale from 0 to 100. By this scale, the average volatility in the United States over the last decade was around 4. Volatility in the 2017 Czech Republic election was over 32, a level nearly as big as in the earthquake election that broke open the relatively stable Czech system in 2010.
There’s another way to gauge the degree of change: by looking at the age of parties. Half of all the seats in the Czech Parliament are now in the hands of parties that have served no more than one term in Parliament. Nearly two-thirds of the seats belong to parties created since the 2008 global economic crisis.
However, while new and relatively new entrants predominate, the “older” parties that first appeared between 1990 and 1992 still claimed around one-third of the total vote. As we argue in a forthcoming article, old parties like ODS, ČSSD, the People’s Party (KDU-ČSL) and the Communists manage to survive (though perhaps never reaching their past heights) because of their rooted appeals, organizational structure and ability to replace their leaders.
In contrast, newer parties based on celebrity appeals usually find it far more difficult to survive more than one or two terms.
The results may mark a decisive victory for ANO, but the party may have problems forming a government. Early elections are a distinct possibility.
A governing coalition without ANO involvement is highly unlikely. However, the ongoing Stork’s Nest investigation has led to speculation of an ANO-led government without Babiš as prime minister.
Despite the harsh words they trade during campaign season, Czech politicians often have been quick to bury hatchets and strike deals when tempted by the trappings and opportunities of power. This election will be no exception.
Some politicians who used anti-establishment appeals in the campaign may become part of the new government, in all likelihood creating space on the scene for new parties using anti-establishment appeals. Hurricane season in party politics looks set to continue.